<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-tuning the returns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/</link>
	<description>Social business design and management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a great post. I have always looked at the big picture and at industries that were more advanced in technology than the ones I was working in or with. I work with the small to midsize businesses and I am watching the big companies that are going to be forced to change  because they have a big brand exposure they need to protect and build upon. I am also looking back in history and looking for the examples of the companies that evolved, I wonder how many industry leaders in 09 will lose that position in the next short 5 years?
Very interesting and fun times to be engaged in this transformation and change. Again thanks for great post...
Steve
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a great post. I have always looked at the big picture and at industries that were more advanced in technology than the ones I was working in or with. I work with the small to midsize businesses and I am watching the big companies that are going to be forced to change  because they have a big brand exposure they need to protect and build upon. I am also looking back in history and looking for the examples of the companies that evolved, I wonder how many industry leaders in 09 will lose that position in the next short 5 years?<br />
Very interesting and fun times to be engaged in this transformation and change. Again thanks for great post&#8230;<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Great post and very nicely written. I think there are actually many and varied relationships and interests among end users (customers), and that key to success in social media business strategies is recognizing the different reasons that users have for participating and engaging.
Some users do identify with a brand, and demonstrate their passion and loyalty more or less directly. But there are also those who enjoy being in the company of influencers (for reasons of their own, be these motivated by self-interest, membership in a social scene, professional affiliations or whatnot). Those who are building reputations as experts, critics, social influencers or what have you, and whose engagements and participation reflect those pursuits.
Loyalty to brands in social media comes in more forms than just the direct identification and reflection of brand affinity: social presence and what users do to maintain it takes many indirect forms, too.
I&#039;ll be interested in seeing whether or not brands can facet their image/message in ways that support and engage conversation among different kinds of users, to build the value that those users relate to naturally (socially). Facets including things like a company&#039;s philanthropic efforts, transparency around its design efforts, product creation, or, say, local community efforts. All of these and more provide stories around which users may be compelled to express interest and loyalty, and most importantly, which they find easy to tweet/blog etc because they relate.
How users relate to a brand is the basis of relationships in social media business design, and it all starts with the user, not the brand. It&#039;s a post brand image age, a brand conversation or brand narrative age. Users are more likely to reflect well on a brand when its branding reflects their interests.
cheers and thanks! great post!
adrian
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and very nicely written. I think there are actually many and varied relationships and interests among end users (customers), and that key to success in social media business strategies is recognizing the different reasons that users have for participating and engaging.<br />
Some users do identify with a brand, and demonstrate their passion and loyalty more or less directly. But there are also those who enjoy being in the company of influencers (for reasons of their own, be these motivated by self-interest, membership in a social scene, professional affiliations or whatnot). Those who are building reputations as experts, critics, social influencers or what have you, and whose engagements and participation reflect those pursuits.<br />
Loyalty to brands in social media comes in more forms than just the direct identification and reflection of brand affinity: social presence and what users do to maintain it takes many indirect forms, too.<br />
I&#8217;ll be interested in seeing whether or not brands can facet their image/message in ways that support and engage conversation among different kinds of users, to build the value that those users relate to naturally (socially). Facets including things like a company&#8217;s philanthropic efforts, transparency around its design efforts, product creation, or, say, local community efforts. All of these and more provide stories around which users may be compelled to express interest and loyalty, and most importantly, which they find easy to tweet/blog etc because they relate.<br />
How users relate to a brand is the basis of relationships in social media business design, and it all starts with the user, not the brand. It&#8217;s a post brand image age, a brand conversation or brand narrative age. Users are more likely to reflect well on a brand when its branding reflects their interests.<br />
cheers and thanks! great post!<br />
adrian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metarand</title>
		<link>http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>metarand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social Media Design: Birth of a new industry&lt;/strong&gt;

New industry sectors coalesce and crystallize as a result of a number of factors converging.
In the case of Social Business Design this is an area that has been bubbling under for about 18 months with a range of different tags, such as Enterprise 2.0,...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social Media Design: Birth of a new industry</strong></p>
<p>New industry sectors coalesce and crystallize as a result of a number of factors converging.<br />
In the case of Social Business Design this is an area that has been bubbling under for about 18 months with a range of different tags, such as Enterprise 2.0,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olique estefan</title>
		<link>http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>olique estefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Well written post. Nice portrait and Topics Thanks for sharing. keep on posting. waiting for your next post.
regards
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written post. Nice portrait and Topics Thanks for sharing. keep on posting. waiting for your next post.<br />
regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tac Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Tac Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visceralbusiness.com/re-tuning-the-returns/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Great post Anne,
I think (and have always felt) that 90% of business problems can be fixed with Communications. Structures, cultures, systems that limit the flow of communication are always at a disadvantage to those that accelerate and optimize communication. Social Business Design at the heart of things is just enabling people to communicate better. But fixing a system that developed 50 years ago isn&#039;t easy. But it&#039;s awfully fun trying.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Anne,<br />
I think (and have always felt) that 90% of business problems can be fixed with Communications. Structures, cultures, systems that limit the flow of communication are always at a disadvantage to those that accelerate and optimize communication. Social Business Design at the heart of things is just enabling people to communicate better. But fixing a system that developed 50 years ago isn&#8217;t easy. But it&#8217;s awfully fun trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
